A C-Suite Guide to Financial Risks in Contractual Relationships

Most Fortune 1000 companies have tens of thousands of active contracts in their portfolios. However, most contracts remain "signed and forgotten." In other words, they receive attention only if issues arise.

What Causes Contracts Not to Meet Expectations?

The majority of executives regard contracts merely as tools for legal protection. Contracts are viewed as a safety net in case of extreme contingencies. Such an approach is antiquated and expensive. Contracts are not only legal instruments but are also tangible assets impacting the bottom line.

On the other hand, the sheer quantity of agreements is hard to manage.

This generates a discrepancy between the expected and actual value derived from contracts. This discrepancy is called "value leakage" since it refers to the difference between the intended and actual benefits over the contract’s lifetime.

Recognizing this discrepancy is imperative for effective contract management. Visibility leads to accountability. Without accountability, value leaks away without notice.

Takeaway Highlights

• Contracts are a financial asset, not merely an insurance policy, affecting profitability.
• Automatic renewal clauses typically cause unwarranted expenses and unfavorable rates/prices.
• Unrecovered penalties and credits cost money unnecessarily.
• Unclear language can increase scope while limiting liability and accountability.
• Finding gaps in obligations uncovers lost financial opportunities.
• Poor administration practices increase costs indirectly.
• Well-written indemnity and liability clauses decrease financial risk.
• Integrated systems and automation improve performance and management.

Three Most Common Leak Points in Contractual Interactions

Each company will have value leaks, but they usually don’t come from one place. They come from repeating patterns that go unnoticed when managing the agreement.

One of the more prevalent leak points is called “Evergreen Drain.” Evergreen agreements are easy to use, which leads to them being used without careful consideration. When agreements are automatically renewed, they continue even if the performance is not reviewed.

These small inefficiencies gradually add up to become significant monetary losses. The service that once provided value might now be outdated, but payments still proceed unquestioningly. This is not an occasional problem, but rather a constant drain on finances embedded in your business contracts.

The second big loophole is related to the lack of claimable remedies. In many cases, contracts contain SLA, penalties, or credits to safeguard the interests of the buyer. However, all these measures are useful only when enforced.

The final source of leakage comes from the ambiguity of contract wording, especially with regard to the penalty clause. In order to ensure that the party responsible for providing a service cannot exploit the loopholes, the deliverables should be clear and measurable.

This can lead to scope creep, overbilling, and disputes that will waste your time and money. Even worse, your organization won't be able to maximize the value created by its negotiations.

In summary, these three main sources of leakages comprise the essential areas in which value loss occurs.

How a Layman Would Approach Estimating Losses

Knowing about value leakage alone is not sufficient; the management at any business requires something more tangible. The problem of value leakage cannot become a priority without quantification.

The first approach is recognizing the gaps in obligations. It means tracking all the obligations made under contracts that are not monitored. For instance, vendors often make certain guarantees about providing rebates upon reaching a particular expense mark.

Failure to claim that rebate results in an instantaneous loss.

AI algorithms can help find such obligations in complex contracts. They can reveal hidden terms and conditions along with important deadlines, expense thresholds, and other things. In this way, the contract becomes alive.

The next step would be estimating the administrative drag. It means estimating the costs associated with the inability of the legal team to access necessary data quickly. For instance, it can take considerable time to find an email or a file where a specific detail of interest was mentioned.

Such searches result in wasting money because people receive salaries. High-paid experts spend hours trying to extract the needed information instead of doing other useful tasks.

Risk multiplier is applied during the next stage. Risks cannot be detected instantly, but they can have certain implications that need to be estimated financially. Contracts not having the necessary provisions regarding indemnities or limitations of liabilities can increase organizational risks.

Financial evaluation of these risks can make one understand their real cost. Moreover, it can show that improving contract structure can help decrease these risks in the future.

From Adversarial to Relational Value

Traditionally, contracts were always analyzed under an adversarial perspective. Each party tried to preserve its own interests, which often led to neglecting collaboration. Even though such an approach allowed one to avoid certain risks, it restricted the scope for value creation.

The maximum value leakage takes place in those cases when parties do not cooperate with each other. For example, if vendors only meet minimum contract requirements, they do not explore further possibilities and, therefore, set up performance boundaries that are imposed by contract terms.

Relational contracts can be a better alternative since they promote collaboration.

Here, both sides gain benefits in terms of increased efficiency. Suppliers will be encouraged to do more than expected because the success of the company and their own success are interconnected. Thus, no permanent monitoring is required.

One possible method for realizing this model is by creating a “Goodwill Register.” It is an innovative idea that keeps records of any good deeds performed by a partner.

For instance, if a vendor provides extra services in a crucial period without any extra expenses, then this action is recorded. This is how you can take advantage of it when negotiating further, as there will be no need to change the contract.

Ultimately, such an approach changes the nature of the contractual relationship from merely commercial transactions to mutual cooperation aimed at achieving value creation.

Implementation: The 90-Day Value Recovery Plan

Value recovery does not mean changing the entire system completely; it only means having an appropriate methodology that emphasizes transparency, automation, and accountability.

The first stage is to have your contracts consolidated in one place. If your contracts are located in different databases, then managing them becomes impossible.

With visibility secured, the next task is automation of processes. Automating reminders for renewal dates, milestone dates, and compliance deadlines helps prevent any oversight related to critical events and processes within the organization.

The last step includes moving from signature-based management to performance-based management. The process of contract negotiation and signing is not enough to guarantee the success of any business arrangement. The real value appears in its execution.

By associating performance and financial indicators directly with contract-related clauses and obligations, organizations can gain control of their value and ensure successful outcomes of any business agreement.

Closing the Gap with Tools That You Already Have

Contract management is not a one-off operation but rather an ongoing activity that needs continuous monitoring, assessment, and optimization. Those businesses that view contracts as a one-off task and neglect proper follow-up will always face problems with value leakage from contracts.

Fortunately, most companies already have the means to overcome this problem. They only need to take advantage of Microsoft 365.

By connecting the data from these contracts with platforms like Outlook, Word, and SharePoint, the link between communication and action will be bridged. Combining this system with AI-driven intelligence will provide an added layer of transparency and control.

Dock 365 is a CLM software developed on Microsoft 365. With this application, contracts become dynamic assets, and the management process continues through their entire lifecycle.

Using Dock 365, you will be able to streamline processes, monitor compliance, and get insights into the contractual relationship. By doing so, you will minimize risks and uncover the untapped value of the existing agreements.

If you are ready to stop losing value in your contracts and leverage them for your benefit, this is your moment to act. Schedule a demo with Dock 365 to see firsthand how modern contract management can deliver tangible financial benefits.

Like our content? Subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn for more insights and updates.