How a Prime Contract Shapes Subcontract Alignment

According to research conducted by KPMG, 31% of projects end up being within 10% of the total budget. However, studies in the industry show that over 70% of all legal disputes are caused by ambiguous scoping and responsibilities under the contracting agreement. It is important to understand that these numbers are the manifestation of an underlying problem in the structure of contracts and their implementation across different levels of the project.

Source: KPMG

The Legal Realities of the Contractual Relationship Between Prime and Subcontractor

The prime contract is essentially the central document defining all requirements, obligations, timelines, and other aspects relating to the project as a whole. For the legal expert involved in drafting such documents, it serves as the "North Star" that guides the creation of every subcontract below it.

Unfortunately, many companies ignore such a connection, considering each subcontract to be independent and detached from others.

For this purpose, legal specialists should implement the use of repeatable alignment processes, including developing an appropriate contract risk assessment checklist to ensure proper identification and implementation of requirements.

Key Insights

• The prime contract defines all subcontractual obligations and should therefore drive all downstream contracts.
• Privity of contract makes the prime contractor wholly accountable for the failure of its subcontractors.
• Scope mismatch is one of the most common causes of disputes in federal contracting.
• The financial terms have to be consistent to ensure that there are no issues with cash flows and risk management.
• Compliance provisions have to be well communicated to the subcontractors.
• The performance risks, such as delays, have to be explicitly linked to relevant parties.

Preventing Scope Discrepancies from Turning into Disputes

Scope discrepancy is typically difficult to spot early on; however, it is still one of the most common reasons why contract disputes arise in federal contracting.

What starts as an inconspicuous issue of ambiguity may become a huge problem as soon as parties begin executing their respective obligations according to a very different set of expectations.

The best course of action in this case would be making sure that all subcontract agreements adhere exactly to the wording used in the prime contract.

The precision achieved here will ensure that all subcontractors know exactly what their duties are, and there will be no possibility of any dispute based on ambiguity of duties.

One of the key factors to consider includes the need to differentiate service and construction roles, especially where there are federal regulations that need to be followed.

In many cases, service contracts have regulatory thresholds that limit the amount of subcontracting, and failure to stick within these parameters leads to non-compliance issues that could bring the whole contract down.

It is important to establish this and still keep the operation functional.

Role differentiation becomes important when managing scope-related risks. There may be subcontractors whose only duty will be to carry out the tasks that they have been assigned, and in other cases, the subcontractor may take part in activities like design-build, among others.

Aligning Commercial Terms for a Proper Risk-to-Profit Relationship

Contractual relationships are not only concerned with legal aspects, but also with financing, where each party will carry some portion of risks and rewards.

The misalignments related to commercial terms of the contract may have detrimental effects on profitability, cash flow, and project management in general.

Each contractual arrangement implies a different risk-to-profit ratio. The lump sum approach entails that contractors will bear a great deal of financial risks. In contrast, cost-plus contracts allocate financial risk to the client.

Although the third option, the GMP model, attempts at balancing out risks and rewards, there should be an emphasis on aligning its terms.

Another aspect that should be taken into consideration is retainage. While federal contracts involve some retainage provisions, which serve as a guarantee that subcontractors will perform according to set standards, subcontracts need to contain similar provisions for the sake of protecting the financial interests of prime contractors.

Otherwise, there is always a danger of overpaying before receiving payments for the delivered services.

Moreover, the payment schedule should take into consideration the real issues related to the payment cycle of the government, which usually takes anywhere from 30 to 60 days. Any other payment schedule can bring negative results to a subcontractor due to possible financial hardships.

Translating Federal Requirements to Subcontract Requirements

There are many regulations that need to be followed regarding a federal government contract, especially when it comes to its fulfillment.

Not only does the prime contractor have to be familiar with compliance guidelines, but the subcontractor should also pay close attention to them. One such regulation is an anti-kickback regulation, which bans offering money or anything valuable in order to influence the decision of a contract.

While these rules may already be clear for a prime contractor, they should be made evident in a subcontract.

Furthermore, another rule is a reporting rule connected with the use of the Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System (ESRS).

In this case, the subcontractor should report information related to his participation in fulfilling the government contract, as otherwise, the prime contractor will be held responsible.

A contract risk assessment checklist will allow capturing all these points efficiently, thus minimizing the chances of compliance gaps and managing all regulatory requirements effectively.

Management of Performance Risk in the Contracting Chain

The performance aspect is when the terms of the contract will be implemented and prove themselves in practice. In the process of performance, risks become noticeable, as there may be some deviations from the expected results.

In federal contracting, the deadlines are usually predetermined and cannot be changed. Subcontractors should also work under the same deadlines, which is why any delays on the subcontracting side might lead to negative consequences for both parties involved.

Liquidated damages may be applied to compensate for the breach of a deadline requirement. This clause is included in contracts to cover any possible losses incurred due to the violation of a contractual term.

Still, it is important to apply liquidated damage clauses wisely in subcontracting.

Termination rights are equally crucial for addressing the risk associated with performance. In light of the ability to terminate for convenience under federal government contracts, prime contractors need to ensure that termination rights are available in their subcontracting arrangements.

Modernizing Contract Execution Using Microsoft 365

Contract management goes beyond creating well-crafted documents. It includes systems that provide support for contract execution, monitoring, and compliance.

Traditional methods of contract management may lack the capacity to handle the intricacies of federal projects.

The Microsoft 365 software suite presents a viable platform for modernizing contract management practices. Through the use of Microsoft Teams, users can establish a centralized platform for communications in which all parties involved in a project can refer to provisions set forth in their agreement immediately.

SharePoint adds value through its ability to create dashboards that display important information such as deadlines, milestones, and compliance requirements, thus providing the necessary insights for leadership.

Power Automate adds an element of automation to contract management, making sure that important tasks such as sending notifications and reminding about upcoming deadlines are completed on time.

Through the integration of a contract risk assessment checklist within these processes, the organization will be able to evolve it from a passive document to an active tool that constantly guides decision-making and risk mitigation.

Creating a Scalable System for Ensuring Contract Success

The coordination of subcontracts according to the requirements of the main contract under the federal government is not a simple task. This process involves meticulous attention to detail and constant refinement.

Legal experts will be the key to making sure all obligations, risks, and requirements are transmitted across the entire contract chain.

But attaining such perfection on a large scale requires more than just expert knowledge.

Dock 365, which is an advanced Contract Lifecycle Management tool that uses Microsoft 365 technology, allows for making this vision a reality by incorporating all contract-related activities into one single system.

This will allow legal departments to implement their contract risk assessment checklist and have full control over all contracts through automated processes.

When the objective is to minimize risks, increase contract alignment, and improve contract performance, you should be thinking about adopting a more structured approach to your contract management process.

Schedule a demo with Dock 365 to learn how it could change your federal contracting game.

Like our content? Subscribe to our newsletter on LinkedIn for more insights and updates.